G-SCOP

Aller au menu Aller au contenu

Rechercher dans Our sitesCurrent site

Nos sites
e-Services
- Annuaire Grenoble-Savoie
- Membres de G-SCOP
- Accès Itinéraires
- Services authentifiés
- Intranet
- Espaces collaboratifs
- Réservation salle
Connexion

Université Grenoble Alpes

Rechercher dans Our sitesCurrent site

French

Sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production

Laboratoire
Recherche
Equipements
Valorisation
- Valorisation
- Partenariats industriels
Production

G-SCOP laboratory

G-SCOP is a multidisciplinary laboratory which has been created to meet the scientific challenges imposed by the ongoing changes within the industrial world. The scope of the laboratory goes from the p... More

Offres de Thèse 2023-2024 Offers thesis 2023-2024 in G-SCOP

G-SCOP laboratory
Offres de Thèse 2023-2024 Offers thesis 2023-2024 in G-SCOP

Grenoble - France

Follow-up survey 3rd PUBLISH-ED Workshop (30-31 january 2014) to foster Publication in Engineering Design

Q1. What did you do with your paper since last February 2014 ? Did you (Multi reply is possible) Publish it ?
Submit it ?
Rework it ?
Put it aside ? (no time )
Bury it ? (too busy)
Other ?

If "Other", could you explain ?

Q2. In which journal did you submit your paper or would you like to do so ? CoDesign (Taylor and Francis)
Computers in Industry (Elsevier)
Design Studies (Elsevier)
Journal of Design Research (Inderscience)
Journal of Engineering Design (Taylor and Francis)
Journal of Mechanical Design (ASME)
Research in Engineering Design (Springer)
Technovation (Elsevier)
Not applicable
An other journal :

Which one ?

What about the design process review of your paper ? In review
In revision
Rejected
Accepted

Q3. If you have reworked your paper after the PUBLISHED workshop, did you precisely understand which points must be absolutely improved to meet the requirements of the targeted journal ? (4 levels of scale) : 4= Yes, I perfectly understood these points and had no difficulty to implement them
3= I think I understood after the workshop but I was not so easy to implement these points
2= I think I didn’t quite understand which points must be improved
1= I have no idea

Q4. Have you encountered any difficulty to improve these points ? If yes, which one ?

Q5. Which practices did you gain when writing a peer-journal paper? For example, structure of paper, explanation of the theoretical gap...Would you be now able to implement them in another context? Would you be able to and explain them to your community?

Q6. After going through the different steps following the workshop (reworking and submitting the paper), do you have any suggestions on how to enrich the content of the PUBLISH-ED Workshop in the future ?

Spam robots, please fill in this field. Humans should leave it blank.

enter the word in the caption

Input validation (*)

The information collected via this form will be used exclusively by the authorised departments of Grenoble INP - UGA and stored for the length of time needed to process your request. Learn more about data protection and your rights.

Date of update November 13, 2015

Contribuer

Vous voyez cet encadré, car vous avez des droits d'édition sur la page

Contact
Plan du site
Crédits
Infos légales
Plan d'accès

French

46, avenue Félix Viallet - 38031 Grenoble Cedex 1 - France
Tél +33 (0)4 76 57 50 71 - Fax +33 (0)4 76 57 46 95

République Française

www.grenoble-inp.fr/suivez-nous

Laboratoire
Recherche
Equipements
Valorisation
- Valorisation
- Partenariats industriels
Production

Université Grenoble Alpes